Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — D DOES THE ete tH tA tT O08! OF AYAENES DEwitlLfe D THE. A Live OISTRIET COWIT SS py8_ nye s$ ah. OF DALLES” EIDE 3 Ell tT. BE STMT EG LEER jt HOMLHEES BRK DULELTLY Oe LESE ST” G/T ESSABLISHEO Bivtliee Cox77t0 S7a766 Sf E/tE COURT PEELE DENT | AE ROLEO ty GLEBE ¢ KL AYO OTHE. tI LIP STHTES CHOEYIST lPOUEF OF AIF PELL SO DECIEIONLS Qr¢ TAL GAO CL Ci 3FTSTOMOVALLY WH O0TAAT {GATT Ef P oe 2) DOES TE Wil TH CHCA™T CotfO7 OF PYLE fox FAHE felt LOLI Wf tT COMET RULES preLAeTE DiS BT fir 2 ly _ Atw OAL NT Cur tthd TELL Ri HT FO Dit fCOEL SS OF JAE . _ Lh BY DER eta E FAME CET IT ta hie gH E OFOORTUV ITI JOEEEK KESCLE TOY ONO FO TLMIESTION py HE §SECB tia fol lle COMLLL MR PESON Df. PERSONS PtttV iE ta OL THE Cat 0f, CF STATE LIU |... 148 DExIED DAVIS Is DYE FOOCESS LIEAT $, ESTMBLISHED) BY ; THE 25. COS 711 F100 Pl O Le L tf hl. bbb FP ; 3) WO THE ALOE BWUI STALE EP LITE PBUSLE THEME TOOTS V0ILET OY |B LEO Si 6 FO PLY § AL FitttTy QF COSGSETIIE fLHPLEB®S tlEtE | LS LIVOE Le bt PIE TPT COA STITOVOY AE wy OLLFTOVS phe CUSED | QAM! Pd TIED MLLE ECL. DEFEAT OLY te COYTERYUEDES OF JHE ; 5 pal 14 pated OntdW tiphtt JEED VET LO DUE FROLEGS OF JAE LA BP ; _ (4)