No. 20-7346

In Re David A. Diehl

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure due-process en-banc rehearing standing
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the denial of Petitioners' en banc petition to the Fifth Circuit should have been considered late, and were there grounds not to have accepted it given the due date was missed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Con Cetming the ‘denial oF Pedvtoners En Wane Pelidion to the Fidtn Grtévuit — Shevid TA have been ConstdetedA late , ancl wele theta Glovnds Not *o have naccrpicd + Quen V4 oes Mailed On the doe lute. . , And Vn Whe = alier vate, Shovid The Petrdien foe Fe heating been Cit ew lade te Tre Fon Court Since Peay tionet Req vested’ The Petitwan' for Teheeting be TreateA ms & Pedi bon for fehentins wortn Segges tien jet Er: bane phrer te ot bins Con srele fed?

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-03
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)

Attorneys

David A. Diehl
David A. Diehl — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent