Whether the service of a fake indictment and threats to foster a child constitutes a due process violation

questions presented involves a post-sentence withdraw of plea for government misconduct: Lo . , : 1) ‘Is the service of a fake indictment ("warrants") and threats to fostera -. . child to induce guilty pleas consistent with the demands of due process quaren-. _ ° teed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? —~. counsel's failure to verify the alleged-filing of ‘another -indict« ment ("warrants") before convincing a defendant to enter a guilty plea consti-tute a violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution _ | Fight to the effective assistance of comsel?| oo, o 3) . Does an unwittingly signed waiver of indictment at a change of plea hearing . _. cure the fake indictment inducement when a petitioner was blindly signing numerous docuinents pointed at by counsel? And is this practice consistent . with due process guaraenteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States . + Constitution as well as the right to the effective assistance of counsel . guarenteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution? : ae 4)" Is the trial court's on record dismissal of “count two" of the subsequent fake indictment coupled with an officer's report affirming service of the : fake indictment ("warrants") at the direction of prosecutors sufficient to ; . |. . .demonstrate a post-sentence manifest miscarriage of justice when said fake mo coe _ . indictment ("warrants") is not anywhere in the record and petitioner did not’ ; discover said documents for nearly seven (7) years after entering guilty pleas? a _ a LISTOF PARTIES [] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. = tt , [x] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . .. . . . .. all