No. 20-736

Adam Frasch v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-11-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeals brady-v-maryland brady-violation criminal-defendant criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence evidence-disclosure evidentiary-hearing prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine if a violation has occurred pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a criminal defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine if a violation has occurred pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii C.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Adam Frasch
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent