No. 20-7362
Charles Braye v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-of-appeals criminal-procedure district-court due-process first-step-act opportunity-to-be-heard remand sentence-reduction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Braye's due process rights were violated when the court of appeals determined that Mr. Braye was eligible for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act but then failed to remand his case to the district court for an opportunity to be heard on reducing his sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether Mr. Braye’s due process rights were violated when the court of appeals determined that Mr. Braye was eligible for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act but then failed to remand his case to the district court for an opportunity to be heard on reducing his sentence? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Charles Braye
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent