No. 20-7367
Sherwood Laran Bostic v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court constitutional-right constitutional-rights counsel due-process evidentiary-hearing post-conviction post-conviction-proceedings right-to-counsel state-court-proceedings state-proceeding
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal err when it denied (COA) status on the point raised that the U.S. District Court erred when it sustained that petitioner has no constitutional right to counsel in his state post-conviction evidentiary hearing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED | 6 DID THE U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL ERR WHEN IT DENIED (COA) STATUS ON THE POINT RAISED THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT SUSTAINED THAT PETITIONER HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN HIS STATE POST CONVICTION EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)
Attorneys
State of Florida