Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in time-barring Mr. Marsh's Section 2254 petition despite his proper filing of a state habeas petition showing probable cause to believe he was detained without due authority

No question identified. : nl THE SupREmt COvRT OF THE UMITED STATES 2 . . . . et fen er; léshig ALE MAL @ OW PETITION FOR biRIT OF CERTIORARS 7C . . THE... FOURTH CARE COURT OF Agperls . . PETITION FOR LIRIT OF CERTIORARI , ooo ; CHASE A. hhiesh | : Loe River Wort. Ce rr CoP | BAI Dell Brook braé : . : Tndepenclence, VA RAYLBYE i fir Parsh allsared! phat hes Abas Corpus | was prope filed eh tliag hin HO stitaforys tollina nile 26 USC stction 2244 (Dd) (a) ant | perdi his séthion AdSY petition Arerhc filed | under 26 USC stetien 7244 D>) CO) The clshret Courts frocecdtoral brags “ hhh Marsh's stetren 2854 petition is Sime barred bu the AEDPA'S spatete of beartatrars bcbich pests yen its errencous Conclesian Phat “ptarsh’s tate Habeas Pébtarn twas # lel 1 Pde Orage hate covrk on Nloverrber~ [4% Alb which cloes ot readem his LsechornT aa54 petite Arrrebes, | Sid fhe Forth Cire Err in Aime ~baeriae Wir, Marsh's Section 2854 petition Pha hé proper’ filed his sfhate Habeas petition woth pretlher Cirtoct Court Shovnag ju ALE: daw? or other tuidlence , probrble cause Fo behewe far? he ws detained twuitbort dante f Author th. ' | . | _ a TABLE | OF CONTENTS Fable of Cantarts Po a , rr it _ W7able of ftherifies, . 2 ee ee AP . WY Surnchter. see ee ee ew , stittmen?’. of He CASE ee a \Reasons for Granta the Write, ee an we SB Lh . A Lean! standard: for issuance of A Cech tient of Appeal nbel for. . B. Keasonable Semshs bteltd lontlode, Or ad least Find Debatable Pak piarsh section ALS 4 petition States A Vall Clam of Be Dean! _ lof 2 Covttoticra/ Kya? C. Reasonable Sorts pst! Conelecle Hat Whe Distret Court's frececlural Keliggs i Meortec? Jor, at hensty debatable. LOnLlisle se 18 | rook of Srvc. 4 2 + ep et te ew ew DT YG . ,