No. 20-7376

Howard E. Martin, III v. Ohio

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-justice appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection in-forma-pauperis legal-access standing systemic-racism
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where are the Justices, Honorable Seer, who is sentencing Petitioner denied an opportunity to present Petitioner's defense, failed to avail the Petitioner in the Court of Appeals, whereby parole enjoyment annual of in Forma Pauperis Statute but kept his Counsel to the previously Established the Injustice?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : Where rethe Juste, Hor a Seer eE roner Whois stented Opporhayty +> pr ed Petihouer s demed qn bn the iy 1 Rie sane arnran wate for Due Proves of the Law ther failed to avant the Petit ey i B Oveuit Court of Appeels, woheery parka foyment aural ob © i, in Pre Pauperis Hatue but Kept his _ Coulvast to the previous righally Established the Lyystice? thet Iu sid rant in Wis DeAnse' How com Ae ceendumedt “ rs ne ot. ye ge Cling Pppell ant recave Ascigtayt in his Cen at Mevice Ts the Coustitubic me Vout? : ov . Atsraweok fo bee teen United States oP America Systembcall t miv wlory towsrds a Cera met & te Suateey| System's Re Y 4 dewoaraphits? Probifevorte Systemic Row presetation Weaponnang the baw to Causes all yates to be ais, which 16 embedded tuthe traiuinue Met Are there yemnont D of ou Agendas of Oppressiou “9 United Shakes Co hia Biscriminésony Tacties enabectstec! Witte plover ates Cons on thet Was established dures adim wa Ooesn'+ veoh? te additional amendment to Abele Slave, oS even teen discriminatory Pov not ackKnowled Tae the. ; wy Cooahhon SERNA Prior to the establish meu re tec FWO year term culin ow ool how Aves Wig omig r Unteot States oh L Sou chbect the t on For tae Ats pre portiouately Challe reat went or when the Management oan Prstitudion works 1 votladion wll ‘ fue. Subardimake traniwe tht 16 0m indectrivedion oP aysten-cbte cornet prachues; then ob Pugcaed by Hevpreat 1, a ene con prochice took slacks a Violajoce ob Covghitutioveilly protected guievest; how tom We correct tis?

Docket Entries

2021-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-05-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Howard Martin
Howard E. Martin — Petitioner
Howard E. Martin — Petitioner