No. 20-7384
Samuel Rasheen Rymond Toliver v. K. Adner
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1st-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process exhaustion-of-remedies first-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech solitary-confinement
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the treatment of the Petitioner on 5/30/17, being forced into Solitary Confinement for asserting his U.S.C.A. Const. First Amendment Unconstitutional? Was the Petitioner U.S.C.A. Const. Fourth Amendment not honored or defended by the Court of Appeals/Lower Federal Courts? Were Both courts' decisions erroneous and in conflict with other appellate courts directly related to exhaustion of remedies trial cases?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : .
Docket Entries
2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-05-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent K. Adner to respond filed.
2021-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2021)
Attorneys
K. Adner