Whether the plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated due to the court's failure to provide an interpreter and accommodate her mental health issues, resulting in an improper verdict

No question identified. : @ 1. That the Plaintiff first Attorney Douglas was the Walmart Attorney Best friend. Also, that the second attorneys the HOOD LAW Group. Let the discovery time Pass for Doing Depositions on the Plaintiffs Doctors. Which the Plaintiff explain that they will explain She Had no prior Injuries before the WalMart accident. (Georgia Code, Section 9-11-26) (1) 2. That Walmart attorney new that the Doctor admitted that Wal-Mart was responsible for Plaintiffs . injury. Also, that Doctor Vicks stated that Wal-Mart was responsible. For the plaintiff injuries and they held the information. That the Plaintiff told the Judge at the Pretrial. The Judge ordered Wal-Mart to do the Deposition Because the Plaintiff could not afford it. Code Section 9-11-36 (c) 3.that the worker admitted me hit, talk to and looked at the Plaintiffs injuries at the time of the injury. Plus, it was all on video tape that the Wal-Mart had some of the video edited and remove someimages. 4.That the Jury was going to settle. When asked what percentage she would take. She asked what they . meant. What number. Then everything was changes. The Jury knew the plaintiff suffered with. A mental health issue due to the case but would not lesson to the Plaintiff. She should have been giving an interpreter to help her in court. The weight of evidence outweighed the ruling. Americans with Disabilities Act or Section 504 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BRAGDON v. ABBOTT 524 U.S.624(1998) rule 42 U.S.C.S § 1202(2 ) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97—156. Argued March 30, 1998-Decided June 25, 1998 www.lexisnexis.com 5.The Court should resolve the following question and award the Plaintiff 1million dollars. , . Ill.