Could reasonable jurists debate whether the prosecution committed a Brady violation when it failed to disclose the prior victim's pubic hair found during DNA testing in a timely manner

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Could reasonable jurists debate whether the prosecution ; committed a Brady violation when it failed to disclose the prior victim’s pubic hair found during DNA testing in a . timely manner that would allow the defense to capitalize on its use? , II. Could reasonable jurists debate whether the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury that it should presume ~ : that the DNA testing on the pubic hair would have been . unfavorable to the prosecution? Rw Re ES ua D Take III. Could reasonable jurists differ with the district: court’s + =~:. assessment that Petitioner’s sentence violated the Highth :*'"." : Amendment? Memon. ii]