Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped the Pennsylvania General Assembly's authority

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Pennsylvania General Assembly established an unambiguous election-day deadline for receipt of absentee and mail-in ballots. A majority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days and created a presumption that mail-in ballots received by its new deadline—even those lacking a legible postmark—would be timely unless a preponderance of the evidence proved that they were mailed after 8:00 p.m. on election day. The questions presented are: 1. Whether Petitioners have standing to raise their Elections Clause, Electors Clause, and Equal Protection Clause claims; 2. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped the Pennsylvania General Assembly’s paramount authority to “direct [the] Manner” for appointing electors for President and Vice President, U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, and to prescribe “[t]he Times, Places and Manner” for congressional elections, id. art. I, § 4, cl. 1; 3. Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s extension violates Petitioners’ right to have their votes counted without dilution and their right not to have their votes treated in an arbitrary and disparate manner under the Equal Protection Clause, id. amend. XIV, § 1; and 4. Whether Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006) (per curiam), counsels against enjoining unconstitutional usurpations of authority to regulate federal elections by State courts and executive branch officials.