Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims

No question identified. : rr he re . i rn ar peed ; : . J; . Ln : . , a a eT ee oe 11 2 Wadd 39 3uU0N dandy A} Natt7tasiwne saso7 Lymo> aH} Low wou POAAIIS AL LP. sip, BMYM aL JollLLwdyng Sivswned yard ANY 429 DoiNoIS DHL Lut] Win, SOWAISIW LIn0? IAL AHL parm Twas OL | LHaly SIA aainad SI upvanasag ¢ wanLarlM . 2ee? aamidywgward ~ A/ Waadde OL OID NPE And 40 ag VWAMOLULLD frad Farryoiry apt 2nerxad aengsagof od ap darnasy Aervorte apth £19 reasay BO A2Lb0/ aya ab Aanzanry datmosd tenoo sitq ao0b Dmpdncaad Db NAIM Igeddet 0 VaScney CL mov) suet dainad st exdopacea yy vanienM G3.1LN3S3ud (S)NOILSANO SS) es “fe ‘ re ae a : fe ‘bos vot an teat : . . . . f. on Woe aot wetess hee ‘ fot . ; 4 a 2 Se Sr rr ae ey, . . Fe ae Wey Tee gs rs er a 2 , Sr ra 1 t Pr rs : is er Lo . ‘ . . . ' 6) a . ‘eo: eS OO te re : . : oe vs : « . an : . . : ne : ! 4 . er ihe ty . : . a . , .