No. 20-7407
Alberto Solar-Somohano v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments appointments-clause arthrex-decision article-i constitutional-review patent-appeal secretary-of-commerce separation-of-powers trademark-judges
Key Terms:
Securities Patent Trademark Privacy
Securities Patent Trademark Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that the appointment of administrative patent judges by the Secretary of Commerce violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented swallows the Government’s questions this Court granted review on October 13, 2020. The Federal Circuit ; as stay oral argument in a similar case on the constitutionality of trademark judges on account of Arthrex pending review. Federal : Circuit 20-1196 :
Docket Entries
2021-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-06-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent The Coca-Cola Company to respond filed.
2021-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2021)
Attorneys
The Coca-Cola Company
John C Rawls III — Baker Williams Matthiesen LLP, Respondent
John C Rawls III — Baker Williams Matthiesen LLP, Respondent
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent