No. 20-7425
Cornelius Kenyatta Craig v. Andre Matevousian, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-conviction criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment reasonable-doubt sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'same evidence' standard for double jeopardy under the Fifth Amendment is unconstitutional as applied to the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : t——.. SUESTLONS PRESENTE N ! pec Kfonooncement on tre “ame vyidence’ standarc ha: SN (i ee FRR oad fastteenth mengtient en Ce | een Ce | | | H | l l i | | | ! | | l l l l I . Po LAS OE ERED me l l l ; a RETATED (RES rr — , RO : CS ee / ; | C bo vs Matevoustou, Vo. 20-5155, WS Cooct of topedls forthe Sixt jlircut, Ailgment eaterec Sept.ll, 2020, rehoarlng request.
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Andre Matevousian to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Andre Matevousian
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent