No. 20-7433

Randy Philip Chaudron v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2021-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence identification law-enforcement-misconduct photo-lineup police-conduct witness-identification
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause was violated when the trial court allowed evidence, knowing that law enforcement broke the procedure of Art. 320 CP photo lineup identification by creating a suggestive identification

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Quéstion6) PRESENTED TI. To THE Due PROCESS ChAusE VIOLATED WHEN TEAL Cougr AlLowéO EVIDENCE, KNOWING That LA ENFoRCEmMENT BKOKE AkoceouKE OF ART. 3020 CP PHOTO LINEUP TDENTIFICATION BY CREATING A VERY SUGGES TIVE TDENTIFICATION BY SHOWING 4A POTO OF THE LINé uP? TL LPF DisPuTéo FACTS KAISEO BY THE EVIDENCE OF THE ACTUAL LEGALITY oF THE POLICE STOP AE IN VIOLATION OF ART. 38-230) seas Cope OF CRimiNAL PROCEOURE SHouLo A LEQuesteO TURY Tr. WouLonT 1+ Be LEGALLY IINSUPFECKENT To Suproer 4 JURY ALLEGATION BY PEANMS OF Véeorct oF TR > One WAS HURT 0% Even PUT IN HAems A motorvenice IF N : WAY 2 k

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Randy Philip Chaudron
Randy Philip Chaudron — Petitioner
Randy Philip Chaudron — Petitioner