Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit imposed an improper burden and unduly burdensome Certificate of Appealability (COA) standard that contravenes this Court's precedents when it denied Shalash a COA to obtain a merits review of his constitutional-evidence, prosecutorial-misconduct claims to sustain his convictions of aggravated-robbery

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Has fe United States lous tol Appeals for the Sixth Circuit imposed an improper burden and unduly burdensome Carfitica fle of Appealabilty (oh) slandard Yhal contravenes dh is Court's precedentts) tuhen if denied Shalash a COA , fs abtain a meri/s review of his CEnsullicrend evidence and: Prasecutorial Misconduct) claims fo Sustarn Ais conuictions of aggravated robbery, specifically when the only two tneriminating wo 11 65804 Ceo-delendants) , recanted their tneulpatery pesky mony! ) A