Whether a sentence imposed by an apparently biased judge, based on material falsehood, disregard of the 3553(a) factors, legally unfounded fixed policy, and the arbitrary assumption and use of legally insignificant fact, violates the law and constitution, and a plea agreement appellate waiver does not preclude appellate review, especially when the Court at sentencing advises a defendant that he has the right to appeal?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a sentence imposed by an apparently biased judge, based on material falsehood, disregard of the 3553(a) factors, legally unfounded fixed policy, and the arbitrary assumption and use of legally insignificant fact, violates the law and constitution, and a plea agreement appellate waiver does not preclude appellate review, especially when the Court at sentencing advises a defendant that he has the right to appeal? i