No. 20-7457
Mark Andrew Morris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-circuit appellate-review certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus judicial-standard merits-review standard-of-review supreme-court-precedent threshold-inquiry
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, use an improper and unduly burdensome Certificate of Appealability (COA) standard which conflicts with this Court's precedent?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 14. Did the United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, use an improper and unduly burdensome Certificate of Appealability (COA) standard which conflicts with this Court's precedent? 2. Did the United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, wrongfully justify its denial of a COA on the six issues presented based on an adjudication on the merits, instead of limiting its review to a threshold inquiry into whether the underlying merits presented debatable issues or was wrongfully decided.
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent