No. 20-7459
Herman Rosario v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule good-faith-exception independent-determination motion-to-suppress physical-evidence probable-cause search-and-seizure warrant-application
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized at1611 S. 28" Street, Philadelphia, where the application failed to provide a substantial basis for the issuing judge to make an independent determination of probable cause? 2. Whether the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized atl611 S. 28" Street, Philadelphia, in finding that the Leon Good Faith Exception was applicable?
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Herman Rosario
Luis A Ortiz — Law Offices Of Luis A Ortiz, Petitioner
Luis A Ortiz — Law Offices Of Luis A Ortiz, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent