No. 20-7466
Charles L. Burgett v. The General Store No. Two Inc., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bill-of-costs civil-procedure cost-waiver costs court-discretion deposition-costs indigency local-rules waiver
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party waives costs if it does not file a bill of cost on time pursuant to local rules?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Whether a party wavies costs if it does not file a bill of cost on time pursuant to local rules? 2. Whether a district court should consider a party's indigency or inability to pay , in awarding costs? 3. Whether the law precludes recovery of both stenographic and videographic deposition costs? : 4. Whether the law allows a district court to award duplicate costs to the parties? 5. Whether a party needs to provide adequate detail regarding copy costs to be awarded those costs? | , ii :
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent The General Store No. Two, Inc, d/b/a Marsh's Sun Fresh Market to respond filed.
2021-04-14
Waiver of right of respondents Thomas Bethel, Terry Grimmett and Matthew Payne to respond filed.
2021-03-19
Waiver of right of respondents W.S.C Services Inc. and Andrei Florea to respond filed.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Charles L. Burgett
Charles L. Burgett — Petitioner
The General Store No. Two, Inc, d/b/a Marsh's Sun Fresh Market
Ryan E Karaim — Franke Schultz & Mullen, P.C., Respondent
Thomas Bethel, Terry Grimmett and Matthew Payne
D. John Sauer — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
W.S.C Services Inc. and Andrei Florea
Meagan L. Blackwell-Patterson — Waldeck and Patterson, PA, Respondent