No. 20-7469
Joaquin Hernandez-Ayala v. Rene Baker, Warden, et al.
Tags: cause-and-prejudice certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus impeachment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-v-ryan ninth-circuit procedural-default
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Hernandez-Ayala's request for a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Hernandez-Ayala’s request for a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether Hernandez-Ayala could show cause and prejudice under Martinez v. Ryan to overcome the procedural default on the claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and discover critical impeachment against one of the State’s primary witnesses? i
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Rene Baker, et al. to respond filed.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Joaquin Hernandez-Ayala