Whether a Batson-McCollum proven violation qualifies as a structural error

QUESTIONS PRESENTED _ See Paces: _| | 5 » WHETHER A (BATSON -mccollum=T.E.B) PROVEN VIOLATION GuALI6 |1-FiES as A’ STRUCTURAL ERROR! AND IE SO. 8 __O). WHETHER UNDER STRICKLAND AND CRONIC,. RRERO may PRe9] [-Sume PRETUDICE, AS THE ERROR OCCURED dveING(Vo\R DIRE), A CRITICAL STAGE. 10 ___b). wie tHe GueRpero_nesenved AUTOMATIC REVERSAL ON HS Tim i CECTIVE ASSISTANCE (BATSon) CLAM i} C) waemen. GueRReeo was DENIED’ FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS AT TRIAL... 13, a 14 __2.) QuESTION2. | 16 |] _2, WHETHER A PETITIONER. INVOKING “THE ACTUAL INNOCENCE. EXCEPTION 17 |L must PROVIDE‘ New DISCOVERED EVIDENCE , OR NEWLY PRESENTED’ EVIDENCE IN . 18 |laccogDaNce with scHWev.DeLo, 513 5.298. 49499), 24 cen en etc nage cet ne ac ttn ep 26 i 27 a 28 a {