Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's application for a Certificate of Appealability without any analysis of whether the District Court's decision was debatable or wrong

QUESTIONS PRESENTED conor CO the, Couck.of.. Appeals. deny Petitioners application fer a on Cectibicate of Appealability COA") Without any analysis of whether _ wa tthe Disérich Gucks decision was debatable or wrong? con Should the Couct of Appeals have.granted fefifiener COA. wee ALSien iS wCong, in many. ways andthe rest is. deboablet cw LE the Disteice, Coucks imrecpmtotien of 18 usc. $IHO2Cb) ___ C79.422.0)") Cocrect even though ib Conklicks withthe Previows _. Inberpretatiens.of the Circuit ond allot the othec Gees? oo co ESTOF PARTE ES ce ent eee el A | pacties appear in the. Caption of the case on the. Cover page ; — RELATED CASES. _. United States v. Cheistian Toseph Pacer, No, 5:16— CR Wed cn United States Districk Couct foc the Southecn Dishict of Texas. Sentenced Tune 14,2017. enna Shades Dist rick Conc forthe Saarhecn Disteck 68 Texas. _ Id, Moig, 0 _Vnited States v. Christian Te segh Perez, No. 19-40714, Unied Shates Coach of Appeals foc the Fifth Circuit, Order entered Sully 162090 ne CS