No. 20-748

PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, et al.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2020-12-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: air-ambulance air-carriers airline-deregulation-act mccarran-ferguson-act medicare-rate preemption rate-regulation workers-compensation
Key Terms:
Arbitration Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the ADA preempts a state workers' compensation system that limits the prices an air-ambulance company can charge and collect for its air-transport services

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (“ADA”) broadly preempts any state law or regulation “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier.” 49 U.S.C. §41713(b)(1). Air-ambulance companies are federally licensed “air carriers.” Nonetheless, the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act dictates the amounts air-ambulance companies may charge and collect for air-transport services provided to individuals covered by workers’ compensation. Specifically, workers’ compensation insurers need only pay a “fair and reasonable” rate—calculated here to be 125% of the Medicare rate—and air-ambulance companies are forbidden from billing patients or their employers for the service. Given that such schemes dictate what the only party that can be charged must pay to air carriers, the Fourth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have held that comparable state laws constitute impermissible rate regulation preempted by the ADA, but a divided Texas Supreme Court upheld the Texas system at issue here. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the ADA preempts a state workers’ compensation system that limits the prices an air-ambulance company can charge and collect for its air-transport services. 2. Whether the McCarran-Ferguson Act exempts such a system from ADA preemption.

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-06
Reply of petitioner PHI Air Medical, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-23
Brief of respondent Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation in opposition filed.
2021-03-23
Brief of respondent Texas Mutual Insurance Company in opposition submitted.
2021-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 23, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2021 to March 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 8, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-02-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2021 to March 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-31
Brief amicus curiae of Airbus Helicopters, Inc. filed.
2020-12-31
Brief amicus curiae of Air Methods Corporation filed.
2020-12-30
Brief amicus curiae of Air Medical Operators Association filed.
2020-12-16
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, PHI Air Medical, LLC
2020-12-11
Motion of respondent Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation to extend the time to file a response from December 31, 2020 to March 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 1, 2021, for all respondents.
2020-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Air Medical Operators Association
George G. OlsenWilliams & Jensen, PLLC, Amicus
George G. OlsenWilliams & Jensen, PLLC, Amicus
Air Methods Corporation
Christopher Michael Lauvane JacksonHolland & Hart LLP, Amicus
Christopher Michael Lauvane JacksonHolland & Hart LLP, Amicus
Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
Douglas A. WinthropArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Amicus
Douglas A. WinthropArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Amicus
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, and Zenith Insurance Company
James Michael LoughlinStone Loughlin & Swanson, LLP, Respondent
James Michael LoughlinStone Loughlin & Swanson, LLP, Respondent
PHI Air Medical, LLC
Paul D. ClementKirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Paul D. ClementKirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation
Judd Edward Stone IITexas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Judd Edward Stone IITexas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Texas Mutual Insurance Company
Danielle Mary SpinelliWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Respondent
Danielle Mary SpinelliWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Respondent
Matthew Birk BaumgartnerArmbrust & Brown, PLLC, Amicus
Matthew Birk BaumgartnerArmbrust & Brown, PLLC, Amicus