Whether attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act qualifies as a 'crime of violence'

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, qualifies as a “crime of violence,” meaning that it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another,” id. § 924(c)(3)(A). 2. Whether a conviction must necessarily establish that a defendant was more than negligent as to whether his intentional conduct could harm another before said conviction can serve as a predicate under § 924(c)(3)(A) or whether, as the Ninth Circuit’s analysis assumes, the limiting language “against the person of another” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) is mere surplusage? i