Oversight-of-law-enforcement-technologies

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Entities responsible for our country’s over incarceration and institutional racism are today taxed with uses of both new and old technologies that fail to provide proof of oversight to the public and I’m suffering them. Law enforcement are banding together in use of weaponry against us all, including technology that remotely discharges: 1. sound/spoken voice infliction 2. gas, chemical and odor deployment 3. precision cutting and piercing, and 4. muscle and body manipulation. . Shouldn’t we have mechanisms in place to guard against the same over-reach and encroachment plaguing communities of color but that today are poised to target every member of the general population falling under category of ‘imminent danger’ when suspected simply of not washing their hands, for example, during Covid times? The old saying rings true that if you don’t stand against injustice, soon it comes for you. . Today’s technologies, remotely launched, like those listed above, need oversight same as an officer’s gun or taser. Reports should be written and records ; retrievable by the targeted and assailed, at least. Isn’t it just as important to one’s Constitutional protections as any, irregardless of whether their situation be incarceration, accusation or investigation? . 1 Further, public scrutiny always'proves to be a safeguard. Mustn’t it be afforded ; here? : . : 2 a , >