Which court has jurisdiction to hear the issues presented in this petition for writ of certiorari?

No question identified. : | _ QuésTtom's PRESEWTED _ ee A plisacet to _teceive matetial, oF atesal Mature with aut foksea o Ffictal Tater Forence wrth ty m afe)_lecal Amy Ma) iolate Batt hishk oF Free Speech wiht to be Free From yayuot ied govern teatal tate Ference with Communication WolFE vy M<Dennell 418 U.S £34 “IM, S.Ct. 3963 4) 1. £cb db G35 citn, Lewis v Casey S19, Us SAD, 951, 16S CT 9174, AlOO 135 LED ac 606 C1950), The sale gueshiods presented ia This Petition ts which Couck Has. Furs lic hey Te Hear This Issues? Becavse Stote Court Saicls 4 Consdilittoral picht +0 receive sutsscle mal sect local Mail United States Disterct Couct OF Northen Diytecck oF OH: Chains Thak since 18 Pekittoner Mose Legg. f Mac Vas An re hate motte Shafi ay Lecel Mac! is Not protect: fp fay Khe Constitutional ficlits , Courts SuArantecs ta te o) “The echt to Accesy fy Courf Aah be Gee Excuse wa justi Feb sayera meat La re/ [-e Feqes with Communiestéon, ee en ee a C6) LE OF COnTeEwTS. _ _QUESTIoms PkEseaTED -. .. ~ & TABLE oF ConTénTs ~~—~ ~—~~. ~~ _. 695 Tob _of AuTHoRETE es ~~ ~~ = — —-5 VETTTLon For Watlof CenTrokser--~ — —~ _ __¥ Opiacons Belo | Jurisdictional Stolemat ~-~ = — — -~_| Constitutional pal Statutory frovisieas — = = — = = — = | Stale meat oF (vse The (ase-~ = -~ -.% : A, Procedural Histor y —The Decision oF The Stvth Greut Cowt oF Aapeals, Edie Ao Constityttonal Aht +o Taverticate Assistance ConFhiets tus: Cout's pursusatto Fed Gu, Nule 0 (blo) 00 ab The obligates whee. Court's Has Made Sthstan tive. mistake oF Law or Fats Sa Einal | Duds ment or ardel cthiag Schener =vHA 213 FRO: DK 203) _ A, Potitence are. Consttutdenally entitled to ed jo fe -sfenio¢ pursia to Eedeal Rule oF trosecbure both). When an Court Has made Subshenke. ta Coucf's, = BO —___{2. Moore demonstiated the neceh For fedl he Chs. to (bdo FOL te stpealey OF ConclusTon = — — 14 _CERTIEL@TE of SEnuice = ~ — — — — — FG TABLE 0 BUTHORTTFE : CAses WOE? -vMl Donnell 419 WS, 534, 44 SCF 2963 WL, Ed ad 436 = ~~ -~apssio Lfblls ~v> Casey $18.US 343 $61 ios CT, 2124,2180 135 Led a bob bm--passion. WolFE-~v AM Donnell 414 US. $34 94 S.CT 2443 Wl LED 1435 —-3 LEWIS ~v Casby $19 US. 34% 361 1168 CF 2124190 135 LE re 606 —-~~ Schoener -vWeil 13 ERO, 431 CD. lun 2007) —-—-8 Davis ~ vs (ovord 220 Fad BYb 351 Crd Cie 2003) — ~== 7 4 Olim v= Wekine lone Yoo UG 23% (1993) ~ ~-~77~7 10 Thaddeuy-y ~vPlatter 196 £4399 Cam Che 195q), ~~~ ~~ JO | Klein ~v-~ MOmc, 49g — == = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Jo £5 Sallier ~vfrooks 393 Fad, $68 $73, ocr wos) ~ ~~ — ~~ lo Jone) ~4Caruso 564 F, 29f 158 267 6% Ch 2004) -—— — —-/o fMensky avMorAghan 100 £ ad 243 249 (ad cie 1999) ~~ — =~ lewis ~uCasey $14. U.$ 943 351 OS Ch 2194 2190 135 LED ad oh <= -U (aneel ~v(saord wo i U5 Dest leets 34YYO nM, vockv uur, 2evt WL 30323 ot” 4 (5, Diy == 2 OF? —lithesow ve PaFF 53, 3h 264 268 Cath Cy 1996) — ~—~ ~~=12 —Tunner-v= SAF ley 49a US 7884-41 jo? S.CT 2254 96 LED ah oy--12 Theen burch = vAbbott Yao US Yo! yi3~14Y Jog S.CT 1924 poy LED 2A 454 Cigggy ~~ a / Shecman ~vMae Dougall o56 E 2d $29 629 C4 C1 199)) — ~— 12 Stet Urs Cons Amend, 15° 5" ig’? «t4 wee 2 Y2US.C 1483 [2 _Federol Qule dE Cul Procedure bo (6)C6) i? fRee is Cay Cut he 2p \eu 6 | NO;-———___ . Low THe Supreme Cout OF THE United States ae . : Ret iener. . _. a . Head Ma:| Room Sereener awa QarTeam , Marl Rom Screener Q MAVESA (Msi.| Rowen Serecnee 1 Lykawsk: Ma: hooe cfeene’ Supervisor Ki chacel And OFFictel Capacities Richland Corr Last pacsusal 251495 Y Oa Wren far WATT OE CER TIONART To __ ——feliticaee Maurice Marre tesectbull goays That a list 0. ertiorari —Issuetoreview The Sudgmeat eatry of Th Sivth Ciscurt Co TG | Appeals entered on DEC, Ad, 2020, OTATONS peLow __ The vpiatan JF The Sivth Circuit Court of Apacalsis unpublished | Mose v Wchlaacl Corr, Tost Ma hoven StefF seb East Ene niches Case Mo, 14-404) Co Cir 2020), Hack bs attached +0 the fetition af tsa tted_at Ayp. Baw Co dod D_of State Court to District Gourd of Lilia ls (4) : —The decisi