Should the violation of Standard of Review for Summary Judgment be allowed to stand uncorrected?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , , 1. Should the violation of Standard of Review for Summary Judgment be allowed to : . stand uncorrected? . , . 2. Should the violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and Congress’ mandate with inadmissible hearsay over objection be allowed to stand and not be corrected? , 3. Should an Employer be allowed to discriminate and retaliate against a former ; employee with a false after-acquired affirmative defense for pursuing her complaint : . through a jury trial? : 4. Should a published appellate opinion with falsity that there are no reversible errors indicating bias and prejudice be allowed to stand uncorrected? ; , _ §. Should a violation of Congress’ mandate with confusing Jury instruction of “but for” means “in absence of” for discrimination and retaliation and false after-acquired — affirmative defense be allowed to stand and not be corrected? . a