1. Should the violation of Standard of Review for Summary Judgment be allowed to stand uncorrected?

2. Should the violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and Congress ' mandate with inadmissible hearsay over objection be allowed to stand and not be corrected?

3. Should an Employer be allowed to discriminate and retaliate against a former employee with a false after-acquired affirmative defense for pursuing her complaint through a jury trial?

4. Should a published appellate opinion with falsity that there are no reversible errors indicating bias and prejudice be allowed to stand uncorrected?

5. Should a violation of Congress ' mandate with confusing Jury instruction of "but for" means "in absence of' for discrimination and retaliation and false after-acquired affirmative defense be allowed to stand and not be corrected?

Should the violation of Standard of Review for Summary Judgment be allowed to stand uncorrected?