No. 20-7547
Saloman Martinez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-discretion kentucky-law sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment standard-of-proof supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant's conviction and sentence are in conflict with the Supreme Court's precedents in (1) Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and (2) In Re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED } . Wiethoraec0 Vhe 68th A%eedk' Ss December 11, 20 20, Opinion and rolling ro albicm Ake uted skates Distete+ Court Soc Mae Eusheen Diskstel OF Kenkucky Convicrion Ond sentence ts Wn ConPVick OF Ae Supreme Court's Frecedeuts z (\) Cramlocr} VU. Washington, S41 US. 36 (2004)s Aad, (3) Tn Re Winship, 397 US. 358 (1970),
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent