No. 20-7549

Shane Arnold v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure defense district-court due-process evidence evidence-introduction knowledge-of-status plain-error rehaif-standard Rehaif-v-United-States trial-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant satisfies the final two prongs of plain-error review for a Rehaif-v-United-States trial error

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a defendant satisfies the final two prongs of plain error review for a Rehaif v. United States, U.S. __, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), trial error if he demonstrates that, but for the district court’s omission of the knowledge-of-status element at trial, he would have introduced evidence bearing upon this point in support of a viable knowledgeof-status defense? Prefix

Docket Entries

2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-05-24
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-04-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 24, 2021.
2021-04-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 23, 2021 to May 24, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Shane Arnold
Gary Paul BurchamBurcham & Zugman, Petitioner
Gary Paul BurchamBurcham & Zugman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent