John Roosevelt Baccus v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Securities Immigration
Whether the court below erred in dismissing Petitioner's claims without adjudicating the merits
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED q. whethetid hecause, Pekttionet BAAany nd _Otney Ciatutes Gael Cader Cited Claims War neue’ been addudiceted on The merits . And Res pond tat arbitra Lapariaus denying Pelitnwer on . iro cesuen| Grdunds Without VPs ching othe mt oF ji . fedifinerr Prat, to ff lawtal A t@ammnd ation of , Oa & Wiig in That Rei poi part Unrea can a ly Applies That prac et fo the Tats be The. Pebrhanert Cares “Walks ta £ Dba, ACEO PAL SER PAGES (@, ! To 129 | lo. WwhetherNid~Detuue Custodians of The United Stuber fourth’ Groat , Loud who waitin Gene Ton led and Lan erdines spar Cfo how ath the Unrkd Mates Ductiek Courk cle a ne Tuli dnd the Sot oF Soy Caroling Kini Fred Evie TH be 0 fn ttten OF tials (Coiuectrvety Ret Pon penTr) lartt Lovered . sdveinintack Aq twit a un dr Te etre Feqéal fregenw i bith oy | um jet; tind Tus Respondtictt bon Awe GS pros uso, Riechit Warden’ detruan moked of the Unrkd fades fourth : WTF Buri In AC ing, Cohnuitinends panned tC, From, Contraco im EX choni for Retondents ude at -