No. 20-7560

Hakim Jakuin Morris v. Jocelyn B. Cate, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-liberties civil-procedure civil-rights color-of-law due-process equal-protection property-rights property-seizure standing strict-scrutiny
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why was I denied Substantive & Procedural Due Process to challenge the validity of the alleged claims made by DMV, DSS and court officials?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Why was I denied Substantive & Procedural Due process to challenge the validity of the alleged claims made by DMV, DSS and court officials? Why was property seized by public trusties without due process of law? 5. Why did the Respondents color of law under enforce policy to deprive me of my civil Liberties through wanton Negligence. 6. Why were my pleadings, discovery, evidence, and motion to a hearing ignored without I Morris Hakim Jakuin the real party in interest being heard in a meaningful way? Why ' did the courts refuse to follow guide lines of Strict Scrutiny, Executive Order 13892 and National Task force for State courts? John G. Roberts Jr., Chief Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Page |3o0f13

Docket Entries

2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Hakim Morris
Hakim Morris — Petitioner
Hakim Morris — Petitioner