Whether Honorable District Judge Paul A. Magnuson Failed To Consider Petitioner's Habeas Claim

question presented for review on grounds consistent with Petitioner’s actual innocence is: 1. Whether Honorable District Judge Paul A. Magnuson Failed To Consider Petitioner’s Habeas Claim Titled Or Styled As: ; Ground Four — Argued as Ground Two on Memorandum of Law: The District Court erred in admitting evidences that were in violation of appellant’s due process clause under the Fourteenth Amendment and denied appellant’s constitutional right to a fair trial. PETITION by Udoh — Page ii In Petitioner’s Original Habeas Corpus Petition Because No Other Adequate Remedy For Habeas Corpus Relief On That Claim In Light of Kerr. v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 400 (1976); And Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183, 190 — 91 (2010)? . PETITION by Udoh — Page iii