When a court enters a judgment that is later determined to be void ab-initio, and a petitioner appeals from that decision, does that start the limitations period over, despite the finding that the judgments were void ab-initio?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When a Court enters a judgment that is later determined te be . (1) void ab-initio, and a petitioner appeals from that decision, . does that start the limitations period over, despite the finding that the judgments were void ab-initio? — CY) ATE A Court Pscrares A SENTEHCE LL A227 Does ir AOE The. FOrses 7G Le Ave The ord xe ritlO SE TWEE TTA J @ CAN ATLEYL SENTEALE Be USEC! TO ENNONEZ OSUBSEUWET FakeSor STKE] COTE fr TLLESAL SETHCA EXVECTS bath SsuTeke Gul CONVICTB, D085 oe AEF Eb OMT frOUk. ThE. VIOAT 70 eSihclieus his pegokerse) (LE QOVEEMBUTF C8) DOES A COUIT have To FoLlouw he PLS OF Biased Vindere Tia suse © mee ME COUT haut To Answer 2 yer 4 #9 Fr SELF thard Ly, 2 OF SUPP, Bur wor 7, 9 EAN A mamorcaahrg LOCKE OF 3 Pace “I thé APUCETION pus Te WAEAT 15 CLERC ACLOpn. fs. bef. node)