No. 20-7572
Jim Bass Holden v. Nevada, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appellate-review circuit-split conflict-of-laws constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion procedural-default right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of a Brecon ment / wmnte wukecwautt Seven s\\k ¢ QQ violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Whether oc” not a Viclokion of nn aldens Sith Amendment Cc saynt Xo counsel AS AeGined by Vassalh Occouceh udnen the Stoke used Me Brecon ment / wmnte wukecwautt Seven s\k ¢ QQ, Wrrether oc rot there is the existence of ; Conflict Ipetiweren the decision 6& which ceviewd ts Soagat thet oles Wes a atic nal wapact?
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-12
Waiver of right of respondent Nevada, et al. to respond filed.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)