No. 20-7574

Robert K. Rymer v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment brady-violation civil-rights confrontation-clause due-process fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Rymer's state trial violated his right to effective assistance of counsel and due process under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Rymer's state trial violated,Inef. Ass't. of by Due Process Cl. 1 Deprived of 6th amdt. attached counsel right by S.P.D. Kuech, Br-II froze assets 9/30/97 96FA228 by ACCUSER (Sila V. U.S.) then DECIDER 97CF396/96FA228 their FIDUCIARY violated 28 U.S.C.§455(b) (Fowler V. Butts/Gittere V. Echayarria/Williams V. Pa.). 2 COVERT: Simultaneous Actual Conflict of Interest Dr. M.J. Chambliss 1996-99 with trial att'y. F.M. Gimbel (Cuyler V. Sullivan) Gimbel got My $5K for autopsy=not done 3 CONFRONT: (Brady-Napue-and progeny) Government /I.A.C.s withheld (Brady V. Maryland/Cone V. Bell) see exhibits A-Z, missing 1-22, and 1-55=proof. 4 Deliberate Elicitation: (John J. Fellers V. U.S. and progeny)6th amdt. counsel right. 5 Rymer's ALIBI-TIMELINE at trial by Dr. Chambliss on T.O.D. and Kramer's testimony on 9/19-20/97 Friday till his arrest Sat. 9/20 at 18:03 Hr. Fond du Lac Police (FAL). 6 Failure of IACs to develope and investigate, strategy, conflict loyalty by 3 att'ys. (Crane V. Ky,/Holmes V. S.C.) lied about CCAP/WCCA records on Chambliss-Gimbel 1996-99. 7 Rymer's right to Open/Public Trial closed 4/22 PM-4/23/98 AM jury conference and jury instructions (i at jail=NOT OBJECT) Gimbel not object=NOT RECORDED on Sudden Passion/ on proof Gail alone came back uninvited=broke in 18:00. 8 Br.II lost competency/personal subject-matter jurisdiction (see #1)lost authority. 9 F.d.L. Police Sat. 9/20/97 18:03 Hr. violated Rymer's 4th amdt. privacy right, NO: charge with 4 pistols to his head=inside CONDO. 10 Rymer's 18 U.S.C. §3005 2nd trial att'y. and witnesses (see #2) My S5SK=NO EXPERTS 6th amdt. right of accused to confront witnesses before jury (exhibits on #97-10298) 11 Due Process Clause violated not fair trial, INADMISSABLE EVIDENCE For. DEntist Dr. : L. Thomas Johnson, surprise witness (NO Pre-Trial)cG V. Yukins), no OBJECTION by Gimbel not getting 14 Johnson's lies=Robert Lee Stinson) 12 Due Process Clause violated 9/21 photo Justin from lake "pattern mark" on head=to jury on 04/04/2003 report of 10/2/97 detective on Pre-Lim of "prune/washerwoman skin" on photo 9/22/97 at autopsy=pattern mark gone from Justin's photo (see exhibits A-Z, 1-22, 1-55). [many exculpatory evidence in exhibits FILTERED by Corrupt D.A. Joe F. Paulus=DEEP SIXED[. : : ol ;

Docket Entries

2021-06-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2020-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Robert K. Rymer
Robert Rymer — Petitioner
Robert Rymer — Petitioner