No. 20-7578

Valentin Spataru v. Rick Ramsay, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights conspiracy cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-punishment detention-conditions due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-dismissal official-conspiracy standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Courts may or may not dismiss an Appeal and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Courts may or may not dismiss an Appeal and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal when the Appellant has not paid the docket fees because the Appellant has a lot less than $595,000 to purchase his first home. Truly, Medicaid allows the applicant's equity value in their home (fair market value minus debts if owned singly) to be $595,000 or less, although some states use a higher limit of $893,000, before charging fees. Therefore, the Courts may not charge such applicants So docket fees, too. | 2. Whether the Courts, without allowing further amendment of the Amended Complaint, may or may not dismiss a case with prejudice as baseless and delusional, even though PETITIONER believes that further amendment will prove his Complaint. : 3. Whether detention is or is not cruel and illegal in a car in which the temperature inside the separate, isolated detention area (SDA) -that had no functioning a/c (unacceptable for a rich state, FL, in a rich country, the USA) and no open windows; the back SDA was separated from the front a/c by a thick wall that insulated itof the car exceeded 104 degrees F, the limit when the human thermoregulatory mechanism starts to be overwhelmed and bodily tissues, especially in the brain, start dissolving and will need more than 20 years to heal or will never heal. Whether the other abuses are cruel and unusual punishment. Whether PETITIONER is a victim of illegal cruelty. One ought to know what issues to expect before visiting a place. 4. Whether officials may conspire to invent fines which do not serve any public interest but benefit themselves and their party. Whether officials may conspire to make their victims lose their cases by . impairing their victims’ cognitive skills, including their adequate perception of their own cognitive decline caused by the abusive officials. Whether a Court may dismiss a complaint without due process, before the independent FBI investigators report their findings. Whether the PETITIONER's failure to appeal a disputed judgment on time may allow another, higher-level Court to dismiss a case, even Page i though a conspiracy group has affected the plaintiffs mind through hyperthermia and other excessive stresses, which postponed the moment when the plaintiff understood his injuries and complained to another, higher-level Court. :

Docket Entries

2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Valentin Sparatu
Valentin Spataru — Petitioner
Valentin Spataru — Petitioner