Can a federal habeas court ignore post-conviction mitigating evidence solely because it is thematically similar to trial evidence?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Cana federal habeas court conducting a penalty phase Strickland analysis ignore post-conviction mitigating evidence that is materially different in quality, quantity and specificity solely because it is thematically similar to ; what was presented at trial? . : 2. Can a federal habeas court determine that a state court decision was ; reasonable as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) based exclusively on intervening precedent decided after the last reasoned state court opinion but : before federal habeas concludes? i