Whether the admission of a translation of a witness's statement made in anticipation of litigation without calling the translator at trial for cross-examination violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments

No question identified. : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2020 ANTONIO NAVARRO, Petitioner, , VS | STATE OF CALIFORNIA, | Respondent. | PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CALIFORNIA COURT | OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR The Petitioner, Antonio Navarro, hereby prays that a Writ of Certiorari issue from the : decision of the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Four, in case number B296251, affirming his conviction first degree murder and a firearm enhancement based upon the murder conviction. He argued on direct appeal before that Court that the admission at his trial of a translation of a witness’s statement made in anticipation of litigation without calling the translator at trial for crossexamination, violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeal issued its unpublished decision affirming Mr. Navarro’s conviction on October 8, 2020. [