No. 20-7616

Deshun Thomas v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constructive-denial cronic cronic-standard effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions sentencing sixth-amendment trial-counsel trial-strategy
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a defendant constructively denied the assistance of counsel under United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), when trial counsel tells the jury that the defendant is 'guilty' of the only crime charged and encourages the jury to impose a 'substantial sentence'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Is a defendant constructively denied the assistance of counsel under United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), when trial counsel tells the jury that the defendant is “guilty” of the only crime charged and encourages the jury to impose a “substantial sentence”? The Fifth Circuit said no, but precedent from the Ninth and Tenth Circuits says yes. il

Docket Entries

2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Deshun Thomas
Charles Walton PrueterWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, Petitioner
Charles Walton PrueterWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, Petitioner