No. 20-7618

Krystal Alexander-Jasmin v. Santa Monica Police Department, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process expert-witness governmental-immunity judicial-review separation-of-powers standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in its dissent from well-established Constitutional and case law?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in its dissent from wellestablished Constitutional and case law authored by its own court, and . law authored by this Supreme Court? 2. Did the Court of Appeals err in its dissent from the official record by excluding admissible, expert witness evidence and testimony presented by the to show an undue bias for uncorroborated, inadmissible defenses presented by the. , “Governmental Actor” . \ 3. Did the Court of Appeals err in acting as a witness, the court itself , testifying, on the official record to “facts not in evidence” regarding i uncorroborated mental health allegations which contradict expert witness testimony of Dr. Suzie Dupee? 4, Did the Court of Appeals err in not reinstating properly served, “dismissed without. prejudice” Defendants, Los Angeles County; DCFS? 5. Did the Court of Appeals err in not joining “Doe” Defendant, the State — of California, to the ongoing court action? lop) : | yw oO ; > sete) . a All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-12
Waiver of right of respondents California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General to respond filed.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 30, 2021)

Attorneys

California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General
Benjamin Matthew GlickmanCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Matthew GlickmanCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Krystal Lynn Alexander Jasmin
Krystal Lynn Alexander Jasmin — Petitioner
Krystal Lynn Alexander Jasmin — Petitioner