No. 20-7624

Jeremy Randolph Martin v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ashcroft-v-free-speech-coalition constitutional-rights due-process electronic-devices fifth-amendment first-amendment free-speech internet-monitoring supervised-release united-states-v-holena
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the conditions of petitioner's supervised release violate the First Amendment and Due Process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) Do thenconditions of petitioner's supervised release requiring petitioner to have his probation officer's prior approval to own, purchase, possess, or use the internet or electronic communication devices and requiring him to allow the FBI to install internet activity monitoring software on his devices violate the decision of this court in Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition?152 L.Ed 2d 403? 2) Do above mentioned conditions violate U.S. Const. Amends. I & V? 3) Do any of above mentioned conditions: conflict with the decision of the 3rd Cir. Court of Appeals in United States V. Holena 905 * 906 F.3d 288 on same important issue? y .

Docket Entries

2021-09-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-05-19
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Jeremy Martin
Jeremy Randolph Martin — Petitioner
Jeremy Randolph Martin — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent