No. 20-7625
James Arthur Ross v. John Myrick, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-discretion due-process judicial-error prisoner-rights pro-se-litigation property-exemption standing statutory-interpretation summary-judgment
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court error by ignoring Oregon's Wildcard Exemption Rule
Question Presented (from Petition)
LIST OF ALL PARTIES *All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent John Myrick, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)
Attorneys
John Myrick, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent