No. 20-7644
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-exclusion fourteenth-amendment right-to-defense right-to-present-defense sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Kentucky Court of Appeals allow Mr. Hansen's right to present a full and complete defense, which is protected by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, be violated by the McCracken Circuit Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Kentucky Court of Appeals allow Mr. Hansen’s right to present a full and complete defense, which is protected by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, be violated by the McCracken Circuit Court when ; the Court prohibited defense counsel from questioning multiple witnesses concerning the alleged victim’s sending nude photos to other people, after the Commonwealth , opened the door to this evidence? . po . | a | coy "
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-27
Waiver of right of respondent Kentucky to respond filed.
2020-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Kentucky