Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the testimony of the state's witness when she testified to the frequency of orgasms occur in rape victims during an attack

No question identified. : eo . QUES TION(s) PRESENTED 1 WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL WAS ZNEFFECTIVE -FOR FAILING TO OBTECT 70 THE TESTIMONY (OF THE STATE?S WITNESS WHEN SHE TESTIFIED .70 THE FREQUENCY ORGASMS OCCUR IN -RAPE VICTI“MIS DURING AN ATTACK 2.WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL WAS ZNEFFECTIVE — “FOR FAILING TO CALL CATHER TACKSON AND PRECIOUS HICKS AS WITNESSES AT TRIAL CEYEW/TNESSES AND ALI) WITNESSES) \/ B. WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE § 794,022 ()) _ ZS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS ZT SPECIFICALLY (STATES THAT A DEFENDANT CAN BE ‘CONVICTED SOLELY ON AN UNCORROCBORATED STATEMENT WA TESTIMONY IN SEXUAL BATTERY CASES, IN VIOLATION OF THE 5 € y® AMENDMENTS TO THE U.S. {CONST/TUTION wa MIST OF PARTIES ee see ee tena CSAIL pacties appear_in the <a ption of the... cn enn fun EASE ON THE COVED POgee cent LAM parties he net appear in the caption of .. cf Me €25@ 00 phe cover poge. ALMSt fF AM i es i ~ parties +e the proceeeting i Phe COvrF TT these gecgment isthe sthzect of this. = eee ow LSTATEOF FLORIDA v. ROBERT. EARL JACKSON. oe fOASE MO. # IB=S2ZBY = CF NO A ig vee 2™ TUBICIAL CIRCUIT. COURT, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. coe nnn| DATE OF DISPOSITION § Apel 67) 2020 0 ou BL ROBERT. EARL JACKSON Vi STATE. OF FLORIDA ease No. yDa0-/09/ a nnn nf FOURTH DISTRICT. COURT. OF APPEAL (FLORIDA) we [DATE OF DISPOSITION i October [77 2020 Ke REWEARING/ REHEARING EN BANC DEN/ED i December 3/°2020 a