How did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disregard and ignore the facts and factual evidence, and prohibition criteria, which require magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne's disqualification, and make its decision in conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, Lifjeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 860 (1988)?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. How did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disregard and ignore the facts and factual evidence, and prohibition criteria, which require magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne’s disqualification, and make its decision in conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, Lifjeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 860 (1988)? 2. May magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne knowingly abuse her discretion to cover and protect Respondent and Respondent counsels’ guilt and crime in perjury and falsifying documents, and contempt and copyright infringement without disqualifying? 3. May magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne knowingly usurp judicial authority to rule on Petitioner’s motions (Dkt. Nos. 34, 89) and issue temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 95) and preliminary injunctions (See