Was trial counsel ineffective when he failed to suppress the affidavit due to the insufficiency of Count I and Rape, and when counsel failed to seek a Franks hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978), due to the patent reckless disregard for the truth opposing the consent statement that was the basis of the affidavit?

No question identified. : Was teial counsel ineffective whenhe— __._failed tosupcess the affidavitdueto ene the. insusticien cy-ofl ount Land.A,Rape,— _ land when-counsel failed toseek.atranks 5 heacing pursva ot to Franks V.Delawace, 43g ee U.S AS4, 65-50(1998), dueto the atant a ceckless distegacd Sor_the tcuth opposing —_— IMS. Consent statement Hats so tetas ee ofthe affidavit . dWastoialcounsel unettective fornot a delibe carting the insufFicien cy-oFC ountl_ land. Rapa, and when covnselfailed to a Motion to Steike the. insubficten cy or a CountlandA, Rapes. ee 3, Was. Pree Weengtully cha og ed with Coustt anda Rape, | __CIAl | parties appeacinthe caption oF the ee ase one Cte pag __ , _ . All pacties do-nctappeactn the caphion oan lof the of an lallpactes tothe proceeding 1othe couct _ | —_— IWhoselodganents the subsectoS His _ petition sas Tollowest _ _ | ohnny Bice, Peo se, feditianec _ a Docs ayegee re _ Wabash Valley eee _ POBox ti Caclisle, IN 47838 0 a Golicitoc benecal of the United Sates a —_—__ Hespondent — a _ 150 Renosylvania Ave. MU, Room Slo1% a — __|Washingtoo, D.C. 0580-000) a Opinions Below... 0-0 0e-0ve ond TT MDEL TO APPLIES a Append XAzeceo02-0 a ce ___Caccall uu. Mate, dle Lind. £le, 204d ean uv State 298 Tad $4,304 MEad : — _ | 201980 Tad urnteernnenamenes dO lB veccoad vi btatey S90 MEd 5% 20n5l — Franks uDelawace,4 39h Si 1F4, (S156 one pene (1179 )eersstoenerrreree nee [Malt dbd@ — Gilltlind uv Shbe, 174 WE. Ad 104g, 100 ed (Lod Ct. App do/a) uccrnnenearamene le Bice ve ate, Y9AOR-1S0l0-CR-GI Tnde Le Ch. App. (AoiS)enece everson cece Sh __ ; | Cheick land v.Washingtaay Vol U.Saatbl§ [oy 8. Cha0sa, G0 Ed. ad b2¢idgy. restoecceosaca ae eens 18 /3/§ 48 er cas rs ae iit a OY, ee EE — Wesley Tae 253 EAL blond [Un diana Rape 2M ale __ (SUPREME COURTOF THEUNTIED STATES _ The Petitioner cespectsull prays thatthis—_ oe Honorable Couct issue gwcit ote ctircact—__ To_ceview the sodgment below. —_. ce oe courts: _.__lappeals appeacs.atAppendiy Mone to the _ pefitionand.1s2—— . ___| repocte dat Mone. 5-009 ~~». _ |... Dhas been.desig nated. Soc -pubhicationbut. ee | snot yet cepoctec 500). 1s uapbhished_~» The opinion ofthe United ates distech eect a ee Couct appeacs_at