Whether the 8th Cir. Appellate Court should have used 'special care' when dealing with a mentally disabled, indigent, pro se Plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d)(e) and appointed an attorney to help him

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the 8th Cir. Appellate Court should have used “special care” when dealing with a mentally disabled, indigent, pro se Plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d)(e) and appointed an attorney to help him. 2. Whether the 8th Cir. Appellate Court should have granted emergency injunctive reliefs against an ODNI covert community operating inside the CCJW, when proof is available that past covert operations were conducted within it. 2 .