No. 20-7666

Willie Ponder v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2253 28-usc-2254 actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability confrontation-clause due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to properly object to testimony referring to the “word on the street” identifying the Petitioner as the shooter — testimony that violated the Petitioner’s Confrontation Clause rights. 2. Whether a freestanding claim of actual innocence is cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2021-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
William Earl Ponder
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner